Vendor Due Diligence for AI Implementation Partners
Due diligence should test architecture, security thinking, production experience, and evidence of delivery.
Knowledge Spaces
Applications
Governance
Delivery
Advisory
Industries
Government and Teaming
Company
Contact
Contact
Scope a Six-Week Pilot
Choose a repeatable task where better retrieval or integration would improve delivery. Define the current baseline, approved information, and a small acceptance test. Package the resulting architecture, evaluation evidence, and operating responsibilities into a reusable offering.
Choose whether the first initiative improves the contractor’s own operations or becomes a customer deliverable. Keep the data permissions, commercial terms, and acceptance owner explicit for each.
Describe a narrow input, output, interface, quality standard, and operating responsibility. Use current capabilities as the starting point and price unbuilt integrations separately.
Example: A bounded offering could organize an approved policy collection and provide an evaluated retrieval workflow, with source maintenance assigned to the customer.
Retain the architecture, source map, evaluation cases, operating instructions, and scope assumptions. Reuse the delivery method while checking each customer’s access and authorization requirements.
Separate discovery, implementation, recurring platform access, and support. Expand after a demonstrated task result; do not assume every advisory project needs a platform subscription.
A reusable offering needs a clear boundary between what repeats and what varies by customer. The source inventory, evaluation method, and handoff process may be reusable even when each customer requires different integrations and access decisions. Price the repeatable work consistently and state the assumptions that could change the implementation scope. This helps a small contractor avoid selling an open-ended custom project at a standard price. It also makes expansion easier to discuss because the next repository, workflow, or user group has a defined assessment and acceptance process.
Discuss the implementation scope with Sprinklenet. A useful starting point: a focused offering and delivery-scope workshop for a repeatable AI integration task.
The recommendations above are Sprinklenet’s practical guidance. Technical context: OMB M-25-22, April 3, 2025, NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
Most weeks I send one short read on enterprise AI: what’s working in real deployments, what’s not, and what I’d do in your seat.
Jamie Thompson, Founder and CEO